Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. Featured on Meta. Now live: A fully responsive profile. Version labels for answers. Related 5. Hot Network Questions. Question feed. Accept all cookies Customize settings.
Figure 1. Readers might recognize this as the Lagrange multiplier method found in most multivariable calculus courses. Figure 2. Cauchy reasoned that, if the characteristic polynomial had complex roots, they must come in conjugate pairs. From here, Cauchy showed that the product of these determinants must be zero, i. The interested reader should take a look at the original paper, available from Gallica. While this paper was focused on pure mathematics, his ultimate goal was to solve physics problems: "It is the integration of linear equations , and above all linear equations with constant coefficients , that is required for the solution of a large number of problems in mathematical physics.
Figure 3. Cauchy's method for solving a system of linear, first-order differential equations with constant coefficients, equivalent to a modern-day eigenvalue problem. Untangling the first two equations takes a bit more work. Figure 4. More of Cauchy's method for solving a system of linear, first-order differential equations with constant coefficients, equivalent to a modern-day eigenvalue problem.
Figure 5. We can easily see how Cauchy's method of solution is equivalent to a modern eigenvalue problem from a typical linear algebra course. As an aside, note that Cauchy referred to the eigenvalues as valeurs propres proper values near the end of this passage. Six years later, J.
Sylvester published a seemingly-unrelated note in Philosophical Magazine on the use of matrices in solving homogeneous quadratic polynomials. In this paper, Sylvester used no terminology for the eigenvalues of a matrix, merely calling them "roots" of a determinant equation. Figure 6. Sylvester's version of Cauchy's eigenvalue problem. Image courtesy of Archive. In a footnote, Sylvester referred to proofs of Cauchy's theorem by C. Jacobi and C. Borchardt , but it appears he did not have access to Cauchy's own work on the subject.
Two decades later, in , Sylvester published another note in Philosophical Magazine , "On the Equation to the Secular Inequalities in the Planetary Theory," with the obvious intent being to describe the mathematics of secular perturbation. After 21 years of reflection, Sylvester chose the word "latent" to refer to the roots of his matrix determinant, and began the paper with an explanation of this choice.
Figure 7. In his paper, " On the Equation to the Secular Inequalities in the Planetary Theory " , Sylvester made the case for naming the latent roots of a matrix. From the eigenvectors and eigenvalues, physicists can calculate an expression for the likelihood that a muon neutrino will oscillate into an electron neutrino by the time it reaches South Dakota.
They can also calculate an expression for the probability that a muon antineutrino will become an electron antineutrino. By measuring and comparing the actual oscillation rates, DUNE scientists can solve for that unknown. If the CP violating phase is large enough, this will help explain why the universe is filled with matter.
Neutrinos seldom interact with matter in the usual sense, but Wolfenstein realized that passing through matter rather than empty space nevertheless changes the way neutrinos propagate.
As an electron neutrino zooms through matter, it will occasionally interact with an electron in an atom, effectively swapping places with it: The electron neutrino transforms into an electron and vice versa.
Such swaps introduce a new term in the matrix affecting electron neutrinos, which tremendously complicates the math. The expressions for the eigenvalues are simpler than those of eigenvectors, so Parke, Zhang and Denton started there. Previously, they had developed a new method to closely approximate the eigenvalues. With these in hand, they noticed that the long eigenvector expressions seen in previous works were equal to combinations of those eigenvalues. Parke said they simply noticed instances of the pattern and generalized.
He admits to being good at solving puzzles. In fact, he is credited with co-discovering another important pattern in that has streamlined particle physics calculations and inspired discoveries ever since. Still, the fact that the strange behavior of neutrinos could lead to new insights about matrices came as a shock. In fact, a similar formula did already exist, but it had gone unnoticed because it was in disguise. In September, Tao got another out-of-the-blue email, this time from Jiyuan Zhang, a mathematics graduate student at the University of Melbourne in Australia.
Who introduced the concept of eigenvalues and eigenvectors and where does the name come from? Is there a connection with the German word "eigen"? Exactly; see Eigenvalues :. The prefix eigen- is adopted from the German word eigen for "proper", "inherent"; "own", "individual", "special"; "specific", "peculiar", or "characteristic". It was David Hilbert who introduced the terms Eigenwert and Eigenfunktion ; see:.
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.
0コメント