Who owns github

Comics Music. Filed under: Microsoft Report Tech. Linkedin Reddit Pocket Flipboard Email. Next Up In Tech. Sign up for the newsletter Verge Deals Subscribe to get the best Verge-approved tech deals of the week.

Just one more thing! Please confirm your subscription to Verge Deals via the verification email we just sent you. Email required. By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Notice and European users agree to the data transfer policy. The social aspect of GitHub was also a powerful driver of growth. Before GitHub, programmers had few ways to prove their programming chops, beyond answering whiteboard hypotheticals in technical interviews. Recruiters could browse public repositories and user profiles to identify prospective hires and see what kind of projects applicants had been working on, making GitHub a valuable recruitment tool.

On June 29, , GitHub introduces its Organizations feature , a tool that allows corporate users to manage group-owned repositories from a single, centralized dashboard. By , it was clear to the founders that the single most important vector of revenue growth would be adoption of GitHub at the enterprise and organizational level.

GitHub continued to attract users at an incredible pace. Source: Github. Amazingly, GitHub had managed to scale rapidly without taking a penny of outside investment. That would change in , when GitHub finally welcomed its first investor, Andreessen Horowitz. By , GitHub had become incredibly popular.

Not only had GitHub steadily attracted a strong user base with virtually no advertising, promotion, or venture capital funding, but it had also grown the number of corporate teams using GitHub to host private repositories of proprietary code.

What GitHub needed to do now was scale revenue by penetrating further into the enterprise. Individuals by themselves, small teams, students, as well as big, massive enterprises. By the time GitHub raised its Series A, it had more than 1. Accepting one of the largest Series A rounds in history gave GitHub much more freedom, but it also placed even more pressure on a company already wrestling with the duality of its identity.

By , GitHub had grown impressively. The company had created a solid product that solved urgent problems and had built an entire company around an emerging technology. To maintain the impressive momentum the company had established and realize its bolder ambitions, it needed capital.

GitHub would use this funding to hire additional engineering talent and develop new products. This was not the case. By the time GitHub began looking for external investment, the product was already clearly defined with a large user base. Best of all, GitHub had been profitable practically since Day 1. This freedom allowed GitHub to intentionally shape not only its product but also the culture of the entire organization, completely free of investor influence.

Too much outside influence can be dangerous. Having already achieved significant growth and amassing a legion of loyal programmer evangelists, GitHub wanted to expand its reach—and its potential revenues. So why bother? Because we want to be better. We want to build the best products. We want to solve harder problems. We want to make life easier for more people. The experience and resources of Andreessen Horowitz can help us do that. This is one of the most fundamental misunderstandings that many people have about GitHub as a company and as a product.

In many cases, GitHub had solved big, ambitious problems with programming itself. What was particularly brilliant about GitHub was that it did so by creating a product that solved those problems that also created a vast potential market for that product. Wanstrath and his friends could have focused on smaller, specific technical problems. Instead, they went after problems that were so big and so fundamentally inherent to programming at that time that solving them created a vast potential market for their product.

This appeal reached far beyond open-source hobbyists and script kids hacking in their bedrooms. It was also powerfully attractive to large corporate interests. Some firms, such as Mozilla, had several hundred repos and hosted virtually everything on GitHub. By the end of , GitHub had 2.

It was the first time that federal legislative policy had been shared in such a manner. Hosting governmental policy documents externally on the servers of a private company was unheard of, as was the notion of allowing the public to fork and merge policy documents. The announcement was incredible free PR for GitHub, and it also hinted at other potential use cases for GitHub that open-data advocates and tech-savvy policy wonks had been talking about for years—even if those use cases would ultimately never materialize.

By , GitHub was version control for many programmers. But it was far more than just that: It was a social hub where coders could learn from one another. It was a programmer portfolio site, social network, and professional networking hub.

Of course, the bigger you are, the bigger a target you become. Blog Read up on product innovations and updates, company announcements, community spotlights, and more. Brand assets Want to use Mona the octocat?

Community stories Developers are building the future on GitHub every day, explore their stories, celebrate their accomplishments, and find inspiration for your own work. Customer stories See how some of the most influential businesses around the world use GitHub to provide the best services, products, and experiences for their customers.

Careers Help us build the home for all developers. GitHub Status We are always monitoring the status of github. Octoverse Dive into the details with our annual State of the Octoverse report looking at the trends and patterns in the code and communities that build on GitHub. For GitHub, the latest incident involving the video downloading tool has provided an opportunity for users to reignite the ICE controversy.

He said the easiest resolution would be to end the contract, which Friedman has described as "not financially material for our company. Earlier this year, GitHub was among the technology companies that showed support for the Black community following the killing in May of George Floyd while in police custody, and the nationwide protests that ensued.

A few GitHub users suggested that the company could rename part of its service so that "master," a racially sensitive word, could be retired. The term referred to the primary area where developers store their code. GitHub announced a plan to do exactly that one week later, changing the name to "main. Holman summed it up this way: "How do I reconcile your position with ICE and what you're saying about support for diversity in tech?